Balbir Singh wrote:KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:32:58 +0200I would tend to agree. With the memrlimit controller, can't we do this in user
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Provide distinct cgroup VM overcommit accounting and handling using the memoryCould you explain the benefits of this even when we have memrlimit controller ?
resource controller.
(If unsure, see 2.6.26-rc5-mm1 and search memrlimit controller.)
And this kind of virtual-address-handling things should be implemented on
memrlimit controller (means not on memory-resource-controller.).
It seems this patch doesn't need to handle page_group.
Considering hierarchy, putting several kinds of features on one controller is
not good, I think. Balbir, how do you think ?
space now? Figure out the overcommit value and based on that setup the memrlimit?
I also agree with Balbir and Kamezawa. Separate controller for VM (i.e. vma-s
lengths) is more preferable, rather than yet another fancy feature on top of the existing rss one.