[patch 14/50] i2c/max6875: Really prevent 24RF08 corruption

From: Chris Wright
Date: Fri Jun 06 2008 - 21:14:24 EST


-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
---------------------

From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 70455e790391dac85d9b483a9e286a40df1ecc7f in upstream

i2c-core takes care of the possible corruption of 24RF08 chips for
quite some times, so device drivers no longer need to do it. And they
really should not, as applying the prevention twice voids it.

I thought that I had fixed all drivers long ago but apparently I had
missed that one.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ben Gardner <bgardner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/max6875.c
@@ -207,9 +207,6 @@ static int max6875_detect(struct i2c_ada
fake_client->flags = 0;
strlcpy(fake_client->name, "max6875 subclient", I2C_NAME_SIZE);

- /* Prevent 24RF08 corruption (in case of user error) */
- i2c_smbus_write_quick(real_client, 0);
-
if ((err = i2c_attach_client(real_client)) != 0)
goto exit_kfree2;


--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/