Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

[Ingo Molnar]

* Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to 
> >> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the 
> >> index only got introduced by Mike's patch.
> >
> > the one below is needed as well i think.
> 
> Yeah. I think you had better take Mike's patches, I don't trust even 
> that my patch and your fixlet does everything correctly.

yep, just discovered that we had them already ;-)

Thomas has just scripted up a new "detect if a commit is not in 
linux-next yet" script that should avoid such problems in the future.

your second patch is still wanted, it would have detected the problem 
earlier.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/