Re: [PATCH] cputopology: Always define CPU topology information[4th try]

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:08:30 +0100 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:44:56 +0100 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Not all architectures and configurations define CPU topology information.
> > > This can result in an empty topology directory in sysfs, and requires
> > > in-kernel users to protect all uses with #ifdef - see
> > > <http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=120639033904472&w=2>.
> > > 
> > > The documentation of CPU topology specifies what the defaults should be
> > > if only partial information is available from the hardware.  So we can
> > > provide these defaults as a fallback.
> > > 
> > > This patch:
> > > 
> > > - Adds default definitions of the 4 topology macros to <linux/topology.h>
> > > - Changes drivers/base/topology.c to use the topology macros unconditionally
> > >   and to cope with definitions that aren't lvalues
> > > - Updates documentation accordingly
> > 
> > See, this is what I meant.  After your patch we have:
> [...]
> 
> Sorry, I don't know how that escaped me.  My changes to the show functions
> should be unnecessary - though I think that the two different implementations
> for lvalues and rvalues are a premature optimisation.

um, what does this mean.  Will you be sending an updated patch or should
I drop those two or...?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/