Re: AT91SAM9/CAP9 watchdog driver

From: Alan Cox
Date: Wed Jun 04 2008 - 14:41:02 EST


> The issue above is rather that probe() should not fail if
> at91_wdt_settimeout() returns -EINVAL, since we'd like the
> driver/module to still load to allow the user to later specify a valid
> timeout via ioctl(WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT).

Every other watchdog behaves as follows

- If you specify a bogus value it doesn't load
- If you specify no value you get a valid default
- If you specify a valid value you get that

I don't believe yours should be different.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/