Re: [BUG] hotplug cpus on ia64

[Cliff Wickman]

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:36:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 11:32 -0500, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> > >> I built an ia64 kernel from Andrew's tree (2.6.26-rc2-mm1)
> > >> and get a very predictable hotplug cpu problem.
> > >> billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis
> > >> disabled cpu 17
> > >> enabled cpu 17
> > >> billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis
> > >> disabled cpu 17
> > >> enabled cpu 17
> > >> billberry1:/tmp/cpw # ./dis
> > >> 
> > >> The script that disables the cpu always hangs (unkillable)
> > >> on the 3rd attempt.
> > 
> > > And a bit further:
> > > The kstopmachine thread always sits on the run queue (real time) for about
> > > 30 minutes before running.
> > 
> > And a bit further:
> > 
> > The kstopmachine thread is queued as real-time on the downed cpu:
> > >> rq -f 17
> > CPU#       runq address size Lock     current task         time name
> > ==========================================================================
> >   17 0xe000046003059540    3  U 0xe0000360f06f8000            0 swapper
> >         Total of 3 queued:
> >         3 real time tasks:  px *(rt_rq *)0xe000046003059608
> >         exclusive queue:
> >         slot 0
> >         0xe0000760f4628000            0 migration/17
> >         0xe0000760f4708000            0 kstopmachine
> >         0xe0000760f6678000            0 watchdog/17
> > 
> > I put in counters and see that schedule() is never again entered by cpu 17
> > after it is downed the 3rd time.
> > (it is entered after being up'd the first two times)
> > 
> > The kstopmachine thread is bound to cpu 17 by __stop_machine_run()'s call
> > to kthread_bind().
> > 
> > A cpu does not schedule after being downed, of course.  But it does again
> > after being up'd.  
> > Why would the second up be different?  Following it, if the cpu is
> > downed it never schedules again.
> > 
> > If I always bind kstopmachine to cpu 0 the problem disappears.
> 
> does:
> 
> echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
> 
> fix the problem?

Yes! It does. 

Dimitri Sivanich has run into what looks like a similar problem.
Hope the above workaround is a good clue to its solution.

-- 
Cliff Wickman
Silicon Graphics, Inc.
cpw@xxxxxxx
(651) 683-3824
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/