Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4

[Ian Kent]

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 17:50 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:41:03PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > >From my reading of that code looks like it's been rmdir'ed.  And no, I
> > don't understand what the hell is that code trying to do.
> > 
> > Ian, could you describe the race you are talking about?
> 
> BTW, this stuff is definitely broken regardless of mount - if something
> had the directory in question opened before that rmdir and we'd hit
> your lookup_unhashed while another CPU had been in the middle of
> getdents(2) on that opened descriptor, we'll get
> 
> vfs_readdir() grabs i_mutex
> vfs_readdir() checks that it's dead
> autofs4_lookup_unhashed() calls iput()

Can this really happen, since autofs4_lookup_unhashed() is only called
with the i_mutex held.

> inode is freed
> vfs_readdir() releases i_mutex - in already freed struct inode.

But it could happen later. So it's academic I guess.

> 
> Hell, just getdents() right *after* dentry->d_inode = NULL will oops,
> plain and simple.

Yeah, I'll look into why I believed I needed to turn the dentry
negative. I'll need to keep the dentry positive through out this
process.

Ian


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/