Re: [PATCH] quota: Remove use of info_any_dirty()

From: Jan Kara
Date: Tue Jun 03 2008 - 05:03:32 EST


Hi,

Thanks for reading the patches.

> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Since there is only a single place which uses info_any_dirty() and that
> > is a trivial macro, just remove the use of this macro completely.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/quota.c | 7 +++++--
> > include/linux/quota.h | 2 --
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/quota.c b/fs/quota.c
> > index db1cc9f..f0702f4 100644
> > --- a/fs/quota.c
> > +++ b/fs/quota.c
> > @@ -199,8 +199,11 @@ restart:
> > list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
> > /* This test just improves performance so it needn't be reliable... */
> > for (cnt = 0, dirty = 0; cnt < MAXQUOTAS; cnt++)
> > - if ((type == cnt || type == -1) && sb_has_quota_enabled(sb, cnt)
> > - && info_any_dirty(&sb_dqopt(sb)->info[cnt]))
> > + if ((type == cnt || type == -1)
> > + && sb_has_quota_enabled(sb, cnt)
> > + && (info_dirty(&sb_dqopt(sb)->info[cnt])
> > + || !list_empty(&sb_dqopt(sb)->
> > + info[cnt].dqi_dirty_list)))
> > dirty = 1;
>
> This is really too hideous in my opinion and looks like a candidate
> for its own static inline function.
>
> Or you can try to rewrite the boolean expression on multiple lines
> using continue, something like:
>
> - for (cnt = 0, dirty = 0; cnt < MAXQUOTAS; cnt++)
> - if ((type == cnt || type == -1) && sb_has_quota_enabled(
> - && info_any_dirty(&sb_dqopt(sb)->info[cnt]))
> - dirty = 1;
> + for (cnt = 0, dirty = 0; cnt < MAXQUOTAS; cnt++) {
> + if (type != cnt && type != -1)
> + continue;
> + if (!sb_has_quota_enabled(sb, cnt))
> + continue;
> + if (!info_any_dirty(&sb_dqopt(sb)->info[cnt]))
> + continue;
> + dirty = 1;
> + }
>
> (This uses the original macro, I know. How about moving that from the
> header to a new inline function just above this function?)
I like this one better. I've rewritten it and you don't even need the
'dirty' variable. The resulting patch is below.

> PS: This is a really good clean-up effort. Good work!
Thanks. I'm just cleaning up my own mess... ;)

Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
---