Re: [patch 01/15] security: pass path to inode_create

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Mon Jun 02 2008 - 07:24:22 EST


On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 09:02:14AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I maintain, that moving lsm hooks into callers is insane. And that's
> *the* sanest alternative that anybody has been able to come up with to
> passing down vfsmounts into the vfs.

Not so. I showed how pathname-based security could be done *without*
passing vfsmounts down at all. Unfortunately, you weren't interested.

--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/