Re: find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc/1

From: Vegard Nossum
Date: Mon Jun 02 2008 - 03:03:30 EST


On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> Will this do? (Untested)
>
> Vegard
>
>
> From a43ef05a8c1f8d45ca88e00fdd31c00ddfdba1b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:57:45 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] proc: fix /proc/<pid> link count
>
> commit e9720acd728a46cb40daa52c99a979f7c4ff195c
> Author: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Mar 7 11:08:40 2008 -0800
>
> [NET]: Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net (v3)
>
> introduced /proc/net without bumping the link count on /proc/self.

Oops ---^

Should say /proc/self/net. Sorry for the spamming.


Vegard

--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/