Re: [RFC 0/7] [RFC] cramfs: fake write support

[JÃrn Engel]

On Sun, 1 June 2008 15:32:50 +0930, David Newall wrote:
> 
> I've not used unionfs (nor aufs) so I'm not aware of its foibles, but I
> can say that it's the right kind of solution.  Rather than spend effort
> implementing write support for read-only filesystems, why not put your
> time into fixing whatever you see wrong with one or both of those?

There is a strong argument to be made for fixing some problem once
instead of N times.  But when that solution is M times more complicated,
with M being significantly larger than N, said argument becomes rather
weak.

And having looked at unionfs, I claim that your argument is paper-thin.

JÃrn

-- 
/* Keep these two variables together */
int bar;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/