Re: [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.26-rc4

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu May 29 2008 - 22:44:51 EST


On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 09:44:42PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:48:39PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > USB: EHCI: fix performance regression
> > >
> > > That's not a regresssion at all! Plus, this patch shouldn't
> > > have included the timeout change. The timeout change is why
> > > I didn't ACK this patch...
> >
> > Well, I was misinformed by Alan Stern about this then, sorry for missing
> > that you didn't ack this one (you acked the other patches in this series
> > though.)
>
> The notion that this was a regression came about by mistake. It was
> stated that 2.6.24 worked better than 2.6.25; apparently that remark
> was wrong.
>
> > Alan, care to make up a patch to fix this? Or should I just revert it
> > in the tree as-is?
>
> Given that the issues are not yet resolved among the developers, I
> think reverting the patch for now is the best course.

Ok, will go do so.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/