Re: [PATCH] NTP: Let update_persistent_clock() sleep

From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Thu May 29 2008 - 13:35:14 EST

Next message: Ivo van Doorn: "Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2)"
Previous message: Philipp Marek: "[patch] removes casting of (void*) private structure members"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] NTP: Let update_persistent_clock() sleep"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 28 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Roman does most of the NTP work afaik. I consider Thomas's git-hrt
> tree to be the route via which NTP changes get into linux-next and
> mainline.

Thanks for the clarification.

> OK, that timer code in there now officially makes my brain hurt.

Ouch, it would be a misery to waste such a perfectly good brain!

> Is it as simple as it could be?
>
> Would schedule_delayed_work() make my brain feel better?

Hmm, I have missed this interface somehow. I am sending an update
straight away.

Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ivo van Doorn: "Re: [PATCH 15/15] rfkill: document rw rfkill switches and clarify input subsystem interactions (v2)"
Previous message: Philipp Marek: "[patch] removes casting of (void*) private structure members"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] NTP: Let update_persistent_clock() sleep"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]