Re: question about splice performance

[Bernd Petrovitsch]

Hi!

On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 10:57 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > If you drop caches you are not measuring splice speed.
> >
> > Use ramfs for your tests (guarantees data is in cache) instead.
> 
> So it seems that the gain when using splice to copy a file into another file
> is very limited. Maybe that's the reason why cp is still using read/write...

To point it out one more time: If you copy from one file on a physical
harddisk (or more or less similar hardware) to another (with cold
caches), the bottleneck is most probably the harddisk.

splice() simply reduces the amount of copied data in the RAM - and that
is practically irrelevant if you read and write to and from harddisks.

So if you want to measure the savings of using splice() (instad of
read()/write(), etc.): Copy to and from RAM disks (and thus rule out the
slow hardware).

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/