Re: [RFC PATCH] kconfig: introduce KCONFIG_* symbols for .c files

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Sat May 24 2008 - 15:53:43 EST


On Sat, 24 May 2008 21:25:40 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We have many places in the kernel that looks like
> the following:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FOO
> ...
> #endif
>
> Which has the disadvantage that the code denoted '...'
> are not even built if CONFIG_FOO is not selected in
> the current configuration.
>
> We know that gcc do simple code-elimination for
> conditionals which is always true/false and
> thus the above code could be turned into:
>
> if (CONFIG_FOO)
> ...
>
> One line smaller and we follow the normal flow in the program.
> The code is always build but we do not waste space as gcc will
> do proper code-elimination for us.
>
> Today this is not possible because kconfig will only
> define CONFIG_FOO if selected and FOO is not a module.
>
> The following patch implement a new set of defines in
> the KCONFIG_* namespace.
>
> For a tristate symbol the following are defined:
>
> FOO not selected:
> #define KCONFIG_FOO 0
> #define KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE 0
>
> FOO is built-in ('y')
> #define KCONFIG_FOO 1
> #define KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE 0
>
> FOO is a module ('m'):
> #define KCONFIG_FOO 1
> #define KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE 1
>
> In other words KCONFIG_FOO will say if the
> symbol is selected and KCONFIG_FOO_MODULE
> will say if it is a module.
>
> With the above included we can now do:
>
> if (KCONFIG_FOO)
> ...
>
> This is not a replacement for the CONFIG_*
> defines but a pleasant supplement.
> Using KCONFIG_FOO will also give us a nice
> error message the day that FOO is no longer part
> of the configuration.

It could help to get us out of the occasional sticky situation, but it
does seem a bit risky. What happens with Kconfig variables which are
just not known about at all with some .configs?

Silly example, one could add

if (KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820)

to kernel/sched.c and that would work happily until someone sets DVB=n,
in which case I assume KCONFIG_DVB_VES1820 doesn't get defined
anywhere?

A more realistic example might be using an x86-only KCONFIG_* in non-x86
code.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/