Re: RTC subsystem and 11 min rtc update

From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: Wed May 21 2008 - 18:19:18 EST

On Wed, 21 May 2008, Philippe De Muyter wrote:

> Should update_persistent_clock not be directly part of the rtc subsystem,
> instead of falling in a detour or a dead-end in the arch subsystem ?

See the recent discussion around my proposal:

I am about to update some of the architecture bits in arch/mips/sibyte,
but otherwise the patchset is ready to go. Feel free to join the
discussion and/or update your platform to make use of the generic
rtc_read_persistent_clock() and rtc_update_persistent_clock() functions.
Testing is always welcome too.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at