[PATCH] Introduce down_nowait()

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wed May 21 2008 - 02:00:41 EST


I planned on removing the much-disliked down_trylock() (with its
backwards return codes) in 2.6.27, but it's creating something of a
logjam with other patches in -mm and linux-next.

Andrew suggested introducing "down_nowait" as a wrapper now, to make
the transition easier.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff -r 92664ae4130b include/linux/semaphore.h
--- a/include/linux/semaphore.h Wed May 21 14:54:40 2008 +1000
+++ b/include/linux/semaphore.h Wed May 21 15:07:31 2008 +1000
@@ -48,4 +48,18 @@ extern int __must_check down_timeout(str
extern int __must_check down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long jiffies);
extern void up(struct semaphore *sem);

+/**
+ * down_nowait - try to down a semaphore, but don't block
+ * @sem: the semaphore
+ *
+ * This is equivalent to down_trylock(), but has the same return codes as
+ * spin_trylock and mutex_trylock: 1 if semaphore acquired, 0 if not.
+ *
+ * down_trylock() with its confusing return codes will be deprecated
+ * soon. It will not be missed.
+ */
+static inline int __must_check down_nowait(struct semaphore *sem)
+{
+ return !down_trylock(sem);
+}
#endif /* __LINUX_SEMAPHORE_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/