Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c : use class_for_each_device

[Dave Young]

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:20:29 +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>> Use class_for_each_device for iteration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c |   96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -upr a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c  2008-05-09 13:55:41.000000000 +0800
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c  2008-05-09 14:24:07.000000000 +0800
>> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
>>  #include <linux/completion.h>
>>  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
>>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
>> -#include <linux/semaphore.h>
>>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>
>>  #include "i2c-core.h"
>> @@ -655,6 +654,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_del_adapter);
>>
>>
>>  /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
>> +static int __attach_adapter(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> +     struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
>> +     struct i2c_driver *driver = data;
>> +
>> +     adapter = container_of(dev, struct i2c_adapter, dev);
>
> You could use to_i2c_adapter(dev).
>
>> +     driver->attach_adapter(adapter);
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>>
>>  /*
>>   * An i2c_driver is used with one or more i2c_client (device) nodes to access
>> @@ -696,21 +705,52 @@ int i2c_register_driver(struct module *o
>>       pr_debug("i2c-core: driver [%s] registered\n", driver->driver.name);
>>
>>       /* legacy drivers scan i2c busses directly */
>> -     if (driver->attach_adapter) {
>> -             struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
>> +     if (driver->attach_adapter)
>> +             class_for_each_device(&i2c_adapter_class, driver,
>> +                                     __attach_adapter);
>> +
>> +     mutex_unlock(&core_lock);
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_register_driver);
>> +
>> +static int __detach_adapter(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> +     struct list_head   *item2, *_n;
>> +     struct i2c_client  *client;
>> +     struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>> +     struct i2c_driver *driver = data;
>>
>> -             down(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
>> -             list_for_each_entry(adapter, &i2c_adapter_class.devices,
>> -                                 dev.node) {
>> -                     driver->attach_adapter(adapter);
>> +     /* Have a look at each adapter, if clients of this driver
>> +      * are still attached. If so, detach them to be able to
>> +      * kill the driver afterwards.
>> +      */
>> +     adap = container_of(dev, struct i2c_adapter, dev);
>
> You could use to_i2c_adapter(dev).
>
>> +     if (driver->detach_adapter) {
>
> Testing for a method...
>
>> +             if (driver->attach_adapter(adap))
>
> ... but calling another one? Can't be correct. Which raises a question:
> you didn't test your patch, did you? I'm also surprised how you managed
> to mess this up, given that all you had to do was to move already
> existing code around.

Thanks for review, It's only boot-tested with i2c part as built-in by
me because I have the i2c device to test.

>
>> +                     dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_adapter failed "
>> +                                     "for driver [%s]\n",
>> +                                     driver->driver.name);
>> +     } else {
>> +             list_for_each_safe(item2, _n, &adap->clients) {
>> +                     client = list_entry(item2, struct i2c_client,
>> +                                     list);
>> +                     if (client->driver != driver)
>> +                             continue;
>> +                     dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "detaching client [%s] "
>> +                             "at 0x%02x\n", client->name,
>> +                             client->addr);
>> +                     if (driver->detach_client(client)) {
>> +                             dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_client "
>> +                                     "failed for client [%s] at "
>> +                                     "0x%02x\n", client->name,
>> +                                     client->addr);
>> +                     }
>>               }
>> -             up(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
>>       }
>>
>> -     mutex_unlock(&core_lock);
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_register_driver);
>>
>>  /**
>>   * i2c_del_driver - unregister I2C driver
>> @@ -719,46 +759,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(i2c_register_driver);
>>   */
>>  void i2c_del_driver(struct i2c_driver *driver)
>>  {
>> -     struct list_head   *item2, *_n;
>> -     struct i2c_client  *client;
>> -     struct i2c_adapter *adap;
>> -
>>       mutex_lock(&core_lock);
>>
>>       /* new-style driver? */
>>       if (is_newstyle_driver(driver))
>>               goto unregister;
>>
>> -     /* Have a look at each adapter, if clients of this driver are still
>> -      * attached. If so, detach them to be able to kill the driver
>> -      * afterwards.
>> -      */
>> -     down(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
>> -     list_for_each_entry(adap, &i2c_adapter_class.devices, dev.node) {
>> -             if (driver->detach_adapter) {
>> -                     if (driver->detach_adapter(adap)) {
>> -                             dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_adapter failed "
>> -                                     "for driver [%s]\n",
>> -                                     driver->driver.name);
>> -                     }
>> -             } else {
>> -                     list_for_each_safe(item2, _n, &adap->clients) {
>> -                             client = list_entry(item2, struct i2c_client, list);
>> -                             if (client->driver != driver)
>> -                                     continue;
>> -                             dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "detaching client [%s] "
>> -                                     "at 0x%02x\n", client->name,
>> -                                     client->addr);
>> -                             if (driver->detach_client(client)) {
>> -                                     dev_err(&adap->dev, "detach_client "
>> -                                             "failed for client [%s] at "
>> -                                             "0x%02x\n", client->name,
>> -                                             client->addr);
>> -                             }
>> -                     }
>> -             }
>> -     }
>> -     up(&i2c_adapter_class.sem);
>> +     class_for_each_device(&i2c_adapter_class, driver,
>> +                             __detach_adapter);
>>
>>   unregister:
>>       driver_unregister(&driver->driver);
>
> The rest looks OK. I'll fix the patch myself and add it to my i2c tree
> now.

Glad to see that, thanks.

Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/