Re: [PATCH] [2/11] Add unlocked_fasync

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Tue May 20 2008 - 19:35:33 EST

> My concern is that the new API as long lived is ugly and not the right
> thing. I assume Linus and others have similar concerns, and weigh that
> over the "some obscure out of tree driver might break".

What do you find ugly exactly? The prefix "unlocked_" ? Other than
that there is no difference.

Duplicated entry points are not great, but they will be going away.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at