Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] memcg:: seq_ops support for cgroup

[Pavel Emelyanov]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Does anyone have a better idea ?
> ==
>  
> Currently, cgroup's seq_file interface just supports single_open.
> This patch allows arbitrary seq_ops if passed.

That's great :)

> For example, "status per cpu, status per node" can be very big
> in general and they tend to use its own start/next/stop ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/