Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting

[Mike Travis]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>> Thats a lot of work and apparently Mike and Christoph are doing it.
> 
> Indeed. Thanks for the support. I hope Mike gets the stuff out soon. I 
> know he was working on one issue that cause the zero based stuff to break. 
> Maybe it would help if he would post what he has so far?

I'm re-basing it on the x86/latest tree as sched/latest was failing my tests
last week on both the AMD and Intel boxes.  As soon as I re-verify everything
I'll send it in.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/