Re: [PATCH] [1/11] Remove BKL from remote_llseek

[Andi Kleen]

> The one case in nfs_file_llseek() where we might care is the call to
> nfs_revalidate_file_size() ï('cos I still haven't finished auditing BKL
> dependencies in the inode attributes). However that case should already
> be covered without introducing any new lock_kernel/unlock_kernel calls
> since __nfs_revalidate_inode() already grabs the BKL.

Thanks. I'll keep it for now with the explicit lock_kernel() and when you're 
finished  your audit and the patches are in before you can just remove them 
yourself. I guess that's the best way to handle it.

-Andi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/