Re: [RFC] x86: merge nmi_32-64 to nmi.c

From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sun May 18 2008 - 16:43:18 EST

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:38:41PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Even more important:
> > How do you want to handle kconfig variables set to "m"?
> >
> > Expand them to 0.5 ? ;-)
> :-)
> Modules use a separate set of variables with _MODULE appended to their
> names. Thus for an option FOO, you'll get:
> #undef CONFIG_FOO
> if it's set to "n",
> #define CONFIG_FOO 1
> if it's set to "y", and
> #undef CONFIG_FOO
> if it's set to "m". Individual tests may check these both as they find
> appropriate.

I do know that.

But your suggestion was:

static inline unsigned int get_nmi_count(int cpu)
return cpu_x86_64 ? cpu_pda(cpu)->__nmi_count : nmi_count(cpu);

And Jeremy said "It would be nice if CONFIG_* expanded to 0/1".

My point was simply that like most of the fun^Wproblems we already have
in kconfig also here the tristate logic we need would make stuff more

> Maciej



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at