Re: [PATCH 1/67] aufs document

From: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
Date: Fri May 16 2008 - 17:07:49 EST

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2008-05-16 16:59, Dave Quigley wrote:
> >A couple of comments about this. First off you might want to reconsider
> >how you are breaking up the patches. 67 patches seems a bit much to me
> >and while the separation between patches is clear it seems that some of
> >them can be folded. Second I'm not sure if I haven't gotten it yet or if
> >it wasn't sent but I am missing an Email 0/67. Typically this contains a
> No 0/67 unfortunately, and --no-chain was also missing when calling
> git-send-email. (Argh, git-send-email should default to no-chain!)

If you use Guilt, it does all the brain-damage removal for you ;)
(guilt-patchbomb to be exact)

Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.

I'm somewhere between geek and normal.
- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at