[patch 9/9] fuse: lockd support

From: Miklos Szeredi
Date: Thu May 15 2008 - 15:54:29 EST


From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>

If fuse filesystem doesn't define it's own lock operations, then allow
the lock manager to work with fuse.

Adding lockd support for remote locking is also possible, but more
difficult, because of the need handle lock cancellation. It's also
rarely used, so leave it till later.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/fuse/file.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fuse/file.c 2008-05-09 14:04:45.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/fs/fuse/file.c 2008-05-09 14:04:52.000000000 +0200
@@ -1341,6 +1341,11 @@ static int fuse_setlk(struct file *file,
pid_t pid = fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK ? current->tgid : 0;
int err;

+ if (fl->fl_lmops && fl->fl_lmops->fl_grant) {
+ /* NLM needs asynchronous locks, which we don't support yet */
+ return -ENOLCK;
+ }
+
/* Unlock on close is handled by the flush method */
if (fl->fl_flags & FL_CLOSE)
return 0;
@@ -1365,7 +1370,9 @@ static int fuse_file_lock(struct file *f
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn(inode);
int err;

- if (cmd == F_GETLK) {
+ if (cmd == F_CANCELLK) {
+ err = 0;
+ } else if (cmd == F_GETLK) {
if (fc->no_lock) {
posix_test_lock(file, fl);
err = 0;
@@ -1373,7 +1380,7 @@ static int fuse_file_lock(struct file *f
err = fuse_getlk(file, fl);
} else {
if (fc->no_lock)
- err = posix_lock_file_wait(file, fl);
+ err = posix_lock_file(file, fl, NULL);
else
err = fuse_setlk(file, fl, 0);
}

--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/