Re: [BUG] sysfs cpu?/topology is empty in 2.6.25 (32-bit Intelsystem)

[Vaidyanathan Srinivasan]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> [2008-05-06 14:04:36]:

> 
> * Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > System topology on intel based system needs to be exported for 
> > non-numa case as well.
> > 
> > All parts of asm-i386/topology.h has come under 
> > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA after the merge to asm-x86/topology.h
> > 
> > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu?/topology/* is populated based on 
> > ENABLE_TOPO_DEFINES
> > 
> > The sysfs cpu topology is not being populated on my dual socket
> > dual core xeon 5160 processor based (x86 32 bit) system.
> > 
> > CONFIG_NUMA is not set in my case yet the topology is relevant
> > and useful.
> > 
> > irqbalance daemon application depends on topology to build the cpus 
> > and package list and it fails on Fedora9 beta since the sysfs topology 
> > was not being populated in the 2.6.25 kernel.
> > 
> > I am not sure if it was intentional to not define ENABLE_TOPO_DEFINES 
> > for non-numa systems.
> > 
> > This fix has been tested on the above mentioned dual core, dual socket
> > system.
> 
> applied, thanks Vaidyanathan.
> 
> This was certainly not intentional - i suspect nobody noticed that 
> irqbalanced was working without proper topology information?

Hi Ingo,

Thank you for pushing the patch to 2.6.25-rc2.  I have tested
2.6.26-rc2  for correct topology information and parsing by irqbalance
daemon in the following system configurations:

32-bit Two socket dual core xeon 5160 processor system
32-bit Two socket quad core xeon E5450 processor system

--Vaidy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/