Re: [PATCH] sched: Improve readability in update_cpu_load() code

From: Dmitry Adamushko
Date: Thu May 15 2008 - 11:32:23 EST


2008/5/15 Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2008/5/15 Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:34:59PM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>>> Author: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Thu May 15 17:55:49 2008 +0530
>>>
>>> sched: Improve readability in update_cpu_load() code
>>>
>>> Currently the cpu_load[i] is calculated as:
>>> this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
>>>
>>> However, since scale = 2^i, this can be simplified as:
>>> this_rq->cpu_load[i] = old_load + ((new_load - old_load) >> i);
>>>
>>> Makes it easier to read.
>>> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>>> index 2d7d8f1..e1a6985 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
>>> @@ -2921,7 +2921,7 @@ static void update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
>>> */
>>> if (new_load > old_load)
>>> new_load += scale-1;
>>> - this_rq->cpu_load[i] = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
>>> + this_rq->cpu_load[i] = old_load + ((new_load - old_load) >> i);
>>
>> This wont work when new_load < old_load ..
>>
>> For ex: I tried this prog:
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> main()
>> {
>> unsigned long old_load = 100, new_load = 90, this_load, this_load1;
>> int i = 1, scale = 2 << i;
>>
>> this_load = (old_load*(scale-1) + new_load) >> i;
>> this_load1 = old_load + ((new_load - old_load) >> i);
>
> it should be
>
> this_load2 = 2 * old_load + (new_load >> i) - (old_load >> i);
>
> scale == 2 << i == 1 << (i + 1), so scale >> i = 2.

argh.. sorry, it's (scale = 2 << i) in your test-program which is
wrong. 2^i == (1 << i), so the (2 *) part is redundant, of course.

this_load2 = old_load + (new_load >> i) - (old_load >> i);


--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/