Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Wed May 14 2008 - 21:52:56 EST


On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:42:36 +0800
Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > /*
> > - * Uncharging is always a welcome operation, we never complain, simply
> > - * uncharge.
> > + * uncharge if !page_mapped(page)
> > */
> > -void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> > +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
>
> static void ?
>
Ah yes. will fix.

> > Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page
> > extern int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
> > +extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
> > +extern int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask);
>
> This function is defined and used in the 4th patch, so the declaration
> should be moved to that patch.
Ouch, I'll fix.


>
> > extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page, bool active);
> > extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> > struct list_head *dst,
> > @@ -53,7 +55,6 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro
> > extern int
> > mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
> > extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
> > -extern int mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page);
> >
> > /*
> > * For memory reclaim.
> > @@ -97,6 +98,14 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_cache_charg
> > static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> > {
> > }
>
> need a blank line here
>
ok.

> > +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
>
> [..snip..]
>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> > Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/mm/shmem.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> > @@ -961,13 +961,14 @@ found:
> > shmem_swp_unmap(ptr);
> > spin_unlock(&info->lock);
> > radix_tree_preload_end();
> > -uncharge:
> > - mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
> > out:
> > unlock_page(page);
> > page_cache_release(page);
> > iput(inode); /* allows for NULL */
> > return error;
> > +uncharge:
> > + mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
> > + goto out;
> > }
> >
>
> Seems the logic is changed here. is it intended ?
>
intended. (if success, uncharge is not necessary because there is no refcnt.
I'll add comment.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/