Re: 2.6.26-rc2-mm1: sparc64 - possible recursive locking detected

From: Mariusz Kozlowski
Date: Wed May 14 2008 - 14:50:31 EST


Hello,

> > Got this on sparc64 startup:
>
> whoa. A sparc64 tester? Thanks!

again - thanks for linux 8-)

> > =============================================
> > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> > 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 #2
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > modprobe/514 is trying to acquire lock:
> > (&cls->mutex){--..}, at: [<00000000005ff538>] device_add+0x3c0/0x5c0
> >
> > but task is already holding lock:
> > (&cls->mutex){--..}, at: [<000000000060287c>] class_interface_register+0x44/0xe0
> >
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> > 1 lock held by modprobe/514:
> > #0: (&cls->mutex){--..}, at: [<000000000060287c>] class_interface_register+0x44/0xe0
> >
> > stack backtrace:
> > Call Trace:
> > [000000000048cc64] __lock_acquire+0x104c/0x1400
> > [000000000048d098] lock_acquire+0x80/0xa0
> > [0000000000701898] mutex_lock_nested+0xc0/0x4e0
> > [00000000005ff538] device_add+0x3c0/0x5c0
> > [00000000005ff74c] device_register+0x14/0x20
> > [00000000005ff808] device_create+0xb0/0xe0
> > [0000000010012ef8] sg_add+0x160/0x380 [sg]
> > [00000000006028d4] class_interface_register+0x9c/0xe0
> > [0000000000617050] scsi_register_interface+0x18/0x40
> > [000000001001c0a4] init_sg+0xac/0x180 [sg]
> > [00000000004960c8] sys_init_module+0xb0/0x1c0
> > [00000000004463cc] sys32_init_module+0x14/0x20
> > [0000000000406294] linux_sparc_syscall32+0x3c/0x40
> > [0000000000013698] 0x136a0
> >
>
> Yeah, this is a bug which has always been there, afaik. A
> semaphore was converted to a mutex. Semaphores don't have lockdep
> checking, but mutexes do, so we just now got to find out about it.
> Some finger-pointing is occurring over on the scsi list ;)
>
> I assume the machine otherwise works OK?

Yes - seems it's running fine. I'm doing some other tests now so if anything pops out
you'll know it.

Mariusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/