Re: [PATCH] take pageout refcount into account forremove_exclusive_swap_page
From: Lee Schermerhorn
Date: Tue May 13 2008 - 15:07:07 EST
On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 14:09 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:43:55 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Or, more generally, 2 + N, for an anon page that is mapped [must be
> > read-only, right?] by N processes. This can happen after, e.g., fork().
> > Looks like this patch handles the condition just fine, but you might
> > want to reflect this in the comment.
>
> No, this patch only removes a page from the swap cache that is mapped
> by one process. The function page_mapped() returns either 1 or 0, not
> the same as page_mapcount().
Duh! I was reading "page_mapcount()", 'cause that's what I've been
considering using for this purpose.
>
> I am not sure if trying to handle swap cache pages that are mapped by
> multiple processes could get us into other corner cases and think that
> we should probably try to stick to the safe thing for now.
OK. I can test the more general case down the road.
>
> Besides, shouldn't anonymous shared pages be COW and relatively rare?
Well, all anon pages are shared right after fork(), right? They only
become private once they've been written to. I don't have a feel for
the relative numbers of shared anon vs COWed anon--either in general or
in the swap cache.
>
> > Now, I think I can use this to try to remove anon pages from the swap
> > cache when they're mlocked.
ïI suppose I can just go ahead and use this version with my stress load
and count the times when I could have freed the swap cache entry, but
didn't because it's mapped in multiple address spaces. Later ... :)
> >
> > > + */
> > > +int remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref(struct page *page)
> > > +{
> > > + return remove_exclusive_swap_page_count(page, 2 + page_mapped(page));
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > * Free the swap entry like above, but also try to
> > > * free the page cache entry if it is the last user.
> > > */
> > >
> > > All Rights Reversed
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/