Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Pierre,

On Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:45 +0200 Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for
> for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.

What it allows me to do, though, is drop your "next" tree if things go
really bad without dropping fixes for Linus' current tree that you deem
necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature