Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/8]: CGroup Files: Add locking mode to cgroups controlfiles

From: Li Zefan
Date: Tue May 13 2008 - 05:25:13 EST


menage@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Different cgroup files have different stability requirements of the
> cgroups framework while the handler is running; currently most
> subsystems that don't have their own internal synchronization just
> call cgroup_lock()/cgroup_unlock(), which takes the global cgroup_mutex.
>
> This patch introduces a range of locking modes that can be requested
> by a control file; currently these are all implemented internally by
> taking cgroup_mutex, but expressing the intention will make it simpler
> to move to a finer-grained locking scheme in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menage<menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

This patch series looks good to me. I've reviewed those patches and didn't
see anything wrong, except a little comments below.

[..snap..]

> -static ssize_t cgroup_write_X64(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
> - struct file *file,
> - const char __user *userbuf,
> - size_t nbytes, loff_t *unused_ppos)
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * cgroup_file_lock(). Helper for cgroup read/write methods.
> + * @cgrp: the cgroup being acted on
> + * @cft: the control file being written to or read from
> + * *write: true if the access is a write access.

s/*write/@write

[..snip..]

>
> static ssize_t cgroup_common_file_read(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> @@ -1518,16 +1580,21 @@ static ssize_t cgroup_file_read(struct f
> struct cftype *cft = __d_cft(file->f_dentry);
> struct cgroup *cgrp = __d_cgrp(file->f_dentry->d_parent);
>
> - if (!cft || cgroup_is_removed(cgrp))
> + if (cgroup_is_removed(cgrp))
> return -ENODEV;
>

This check seems redundant now.

> - if (cft->read)
> - return cft->read(cgrp, cft, file, buf, nbytes, ppos);
> - if (cft->read_u64)
> - return cgroup_read_u64(cgrp, cft, file, buf, nbytes, ppos);
> - if (cft->read_s64)
> - return cgroup_read_s64(cgrp, cft, file, buf, nbytes, ppos);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (cft->read) {
> + /* Raw read function - no extra processing by cgroups */
> + ssize_t retval = cgroup_file_lock(cgrp, cft, 0);
> + if (!retval)
> + retval = cft->read(cgrp, cft, file, buf, nbytes, ppos);
> + cgroup_file_unlock(cgrp, cft, 0);
> + return retval;
> + }
> + if (cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64)
> + return cgroup_read_X64(cgrp, cft, file, buf, nbytes, ppos);
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> }

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/