[PATCH] Mark res_counter_charge(_locked) with __must_check

[Pavel Emelyanov]

Ignoring theirs return value may result in counter underflow
in the future - when the value charged will be uncharged (or in
"leaks" - when the value is not uncharged).

This also prevents from using charging routines to decrement the
counter value (i.e. uncharge it) ;)

(Current code works OK with res_counter, however :) )

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
index 6d9e1fc..125660e 100644
--- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -95,8 +95,10 @@ void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter);
  * counter->limit _locked call expects the counter->lock to be taken
  */
 
-int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
-int res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
+int __must_check res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter,
+		unsigned long val);
+int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
+		unsigned long val);
 
 /*
  * uncharge - tell that some portion of the resource is released
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/