Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem

[Pekka Enberg]

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Actually I looked both at the struct and at the slab alignment just in
>  case it was changed recently. Now after reading your mail I also
>  compiled it just in case.
>
>  @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct anon_vma {
>   struct anon_vma {
>
>         spinlock_t lock;        /* Serialize access to vma list */
>
>         struct list_head head;  /* List of private "related" vmas */
>  +       int flag:1;
>   };

You might want to read carefully what Linus wrote:

> The one that already has a 4 byte padding thing on x86-64 just after the
> spinlock? And that on 32-bit x86 (with less than 256 CPU's) would have two
> bytes of padding if we didn't just make the spinlock type unconditionally
> 32 bits rather than the 16 bits we actually _use_?

So you need to add the flag _after_ ->lock and _before_ ->head....

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/