Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: fix returning void-valued expressionwarnings

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Apr 30 2008 - 23:19:36 EST




On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote:
>
> Well, in an X86_32 allyesconfig, this only trips 32 times...so it's not
> exactly common. I agree that there is nothing _wrong_ with this, I'll
> just add Linus and see if we can just call it codingstyle ;)

I actually had a patch to sparse to _not_ complain about it, because I
think it's one of the sane C++ extensions. I must have lost the patch and
not sent it upstream.

So in general, I don't mind the "return void_function()" in a void
function, I think it makes sense from a type standpoint, and sometimes
results in cleaner code. That said, I'm also not sure it's worth breaking
the C standard over, so I don't really mind it being fixed in the kernel
either (but would certainly also not complain if sparse were to be changed
to not complain)

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/