Re: Additional kconfig targets (cloneconfig, nonint_oldconfig etc)

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Tuesday 2008-04-29 20:35, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
>I plan to drop the 'very chatty' mode as I
>do not see it usefull.
>So in essense 'make oldconfig' and 'make silentoldconfig'
>become equal.

Sounds good.


>The commands we have today for kconfig is:
>
># Command line variants
>make oldconfig
>make silentoldconfig
>make defconfig
>make XXX_defconfig
>
>(The other frontends are left out on purpose).
>The challenge here is to come up with a syntax that
>allows us to select between the three behaviours,
>while keeping backward compatibility.
>
>The best suggestion I have so far is to say that:
>a) if defconfig is specified then we use method 1)
>b) if oldconfig is specified then we use method 2)
>c) if newconfig is specified then we use method 3)

[Where is 1) defined?]

>And we add support for a new 'commandline' parameter
>'K' so I can say:
>
>make K=/proc/config.gz defconfig
>make K=i386_defconfig  defconfig
>make K=i386_defconfig  oldconfig
>make K=/proc/config.gz newconfig
>
>So K is used to specify what config file we use
>to start out from.

Oh that's real good, even better than cloneconfig.

># Enviroment variables affecting kconfig
>KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG
>KCONFIG_NOSILENTUPDATE
>KCONFIG_CONFIG
>KCONFIG_OVERWRITECONFIG
>KCONFIG_NOTIMESTAMP
>KCONFIG_AUTOCONFIG
>KCONFIG_AUTOHEADER

Ok and these are doing .. what?

>#input files (aparts from the mandatory ones)
>all.config
>allno.config
>allmod.config
>allyes.config
>allrandom.config

Used for..?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/