Re: Why use /bin/sh in kernel build system?
From: Mark Rustad
Date: Tue Apr 29 2008 - 16:27:49 EST
On Apr 29, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
I read in the latest Linux Journal magazine that someone noticed
that even
though the kernel scripts say #!/bin/sh, many of them are really
bash scripts.
This person went through the effort of changing the script to be
true 'sh'
scripts. Has that code been merged in?
I have no patches pending but I may have lost them.
As I am 100% ignorant about what is bash and what is not bash
specialities
I will more or less be blind when I apply them so I hope they are well
tested.
So why use /bin/sh ever in the kernel build system? I consciously
began using /bin/bash consistently in scripts years ago because you
just never know what you get when you use /bin/sh. I remember
replacing /bin/sh with /bin/bash in gcc's build system to get it to
work on some system at some point. Life is too short to keep having to
fight silliness like this and I can't see a valid reason why a system
building a Linux kernel, or for that matter gcc, should not have the
bash shell installed on it.
And on some systems, changing /bin/sh to point to /bin/bash can result
in subtle problems with that system's environment, so that is not a
good option. At least by using /bin/bash you know what you get and the
dependency is then known to all.
--
Mark Rustad, MRustad@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/