[PATCH] autofs4 - fix compile warning in waitq.c:autofs4_expire_indirect()

From: Ian Kent
Date: Mon Apr 28 2008 - 02:20:11 EST



Hi Andrew,

This patch re-orders some code in expire.c:autofs4_expire_indirect()
to avoid compile warning, reported by Harvey Harrison:

CHECK fs/autofs4/expire.c
fs/autofs4/expire.c:383:2: warning: context imbalance in
'autofs4_expire_indirect' - unexpected unlock

Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
diff -up linux-2.6.25-mm1/fs/autofs4/expire.c.cleanup-expire-indirect linux-2.6.25-mm1/fs/autofs4/expire.c
--- linux-2.6.25-mm1/fs/autofs4/expire.c.cleanup-expire-indirect 2008-04-28 11:38:55.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-2.6.25-mm1/fs/autofs4/expire.c 2008-04-28 11:39:17.000000000 +0800
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static struct dentry *autofs4_expire_ind
/* Can we expire this guy */
if (autofs4_can_expire(dentry, timeout, do_now)) {
expired = dentry;
- break;
+ goto found;
}
goto next;
}
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static struct dentry *autofs4_expire_ind
inf->flags |= AUTOFS_INF_EXPIRING;
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
expired = dentry;
- break;
+ goto found;
}
spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
/*
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static struct dentry *autofs4_expire_ind
expired = autofs4_check_leaves(mnt, dentry, timeout, do_now);
if (expired) {
dput(dentry);
- break;
+ goto found;
}
}
next:
@@ -371,18 +371,16 @@ next:
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
next = next->next;
}
-
- if (expired) {
- DPRINTK("returning %p %.*s",
- expired, (int)expired->d_name.len, expired->d_name.name);
- spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
- list_move(&expired->d_parent->d_subdirs, &expired->d_u.d_child);
- spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
- return expired;
- }
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
-
return NULL;
+
+found:
+ DPRINTK("returning %p %.*s",
+ expired, (int)expired->d_name.len, expired->d_name.name);
+ spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
+ list_move(&expired->d_parent->d_subdirs, &expired->d_u.d_child);
+ spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
+ return expired;
}

/* Perform an expiry operation */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/