Re: [PATCH v2] eventfd, signalfd, timerfd, epoll_create w/flags

From: Ulrich Drepper
Date: Mon Apr 28 2008 - 01:46:05 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> unsigned int oflags_remap(const struct oflags_rmap *m, int n,
> int f, int *rf)
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0, *rf = 0; i < n; i++, m++)
> if (f & m->f) {
> *rf |= m->of;
> f &= ~m->f;
> }
> return f ? -EINVAL: 0;
> }

This will be more expensive in terms of code and runtime. Plus: who
knows whether there will really be other flags which can be used like
this? I think it's overkill to do this. If at some point there are
more flags which are handled the same way one could do something like
this but I don't think it's necessary now.

- --
â Ulrich Drepper â Red Hat, Inc. â 444 Castro St â Mountain View, CA â
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgVY+QACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHTN9gCdG6HxUENiLQqmSFPc5LMAcHna
Nc0AnAhma85jwTCS+XTsQ/MrNngQAT+i
=3vVs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/