get_online_cpus() && workqueues

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Sat Apr 26 2008 - 10:43:41 EST


Gautham, Srivatsa, seriously, can't we uglify cpu.c a little bit to solve
the problem. Please see the illustration patch below. It looks complicated,
but in fact it is quite trivial.

In short: work_struct can't use get_online_cpus() due to deadlock with the
CPU_DEAD phase.

Can't we add another nested lock which is dropped right after __cpu_die()?
(in fact I think it could be dropped after __stop_machine_run).

The new read-lock is get_online_map() (just a random name for now). The only
difference wrt get_online_cpus() is that it doesn't protect against CPU_DEAD,
but most users of get_online_cpus() doesn't need this, they only need a
stable cpu_online_map and sometimes they need to be sure that some per-cpu
object (say, cpu_workqueue_struct->thread) can't be destroyed under this
lock.

get_online_map() seem to fit for this, and can be used from work->func().
(actually, I think most users of use get_online_cpus() could use the new
helper instead, but this doen't matter).

Heiko, what do you think? Is it suitable for arch_reinit_sched_domains()?

Oleg.

--- 25/kernel/cpu.c~HP_LOCK 2008-02-16 18:36:37.000000000 +0300
+++ 25/kernel/cpu.c 2008-04-26 18:14:25.000000000 +0400
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static __cpuinitdata RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(c
*/
static int cpu_hotplug_disabled;

-static struct {
+static struct cpu_lock {
struct task_struct *active_writer;
struct mutex lock; /* Synchronizes accesses to refcount, */
/*
@@ -33,41 +33,65 @@ static struct {
* an ongoing cpu hotplug operation.
*/
int refcount;
-} cpu_hotplug;
+} cpu_hotplug, online_map;
+
+static inline void __cpu_hotplug_init(struct cpu_lock *cpu_lock)
+{
+ cpu_lock->active_writer = NULL;
+ mutex_init(&cpu_lock->lock);
+ cpu_lock->refcount = 0;
+}

void __init cpu_hotplug_init(void)
{
- cpu_hotplug.active_writer = NULL;
- mutex_init(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
- cpu_hotplug.refcount = 0;
+ __cpu_hotplug_init(&cpu_hotplug);
+ __cpu_hotplug_init(&online_map);
}

#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU

-void get_online_cpus(void)
+void cpu_read_lock(struct cpu_lock *cpu_lock)
{
might_sleep();
- if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
+ if (cpu_lock->active_writer == current)
return;
- mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
- cpu_hotplug.refcount++;
- mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ mutex_lock(&cpu_lock->lock);
+ cpu_lock->refcount++;
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_lock->lock);
+}

+void get_online_cpus(void)
+{
+ cpu_read_lock(&cpu_hotplug);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_online_cpus);

-void put_online_cpus(void)
+void get_online_map(void)
{
- if (cpu_hotplug.active_writer == current)
+ cpu_read_lock(&online_map);
+}
+
+void cpu_read_unlock(struct cpu_lock *cpu_lock)
+{
+ if (cpu_lock->active_writer == current)
return;
- mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
- if (!--cpu_hotplug.refcount && unlikely(cpu_hotplug.active_writer))
- wake_up_process(cpu_hotplug.active_writer);
- mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ mutex_lock(&cpu_lock->lock);
+ if (!--cpu_lock->refcount && unlikely(cpu_lock->active_writer))
+ wake_up_process(cpu_lock->active_writer);
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_lock->lock);
+}

+void put_online_cpus(void)
+{
+ cpu_read_unlock(&cpu_hotplug);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(put_online_cpus);

+void put_online_map(void)
+{
+ cpu_read_unlock(&online_map);
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */

/*
@@ -91,7 +115,7 @@ void cpu_maps_update_done(void)
* Note that during a cpu-hotplug operation, the new readers, if any,
* will be blocked by the cpu_hotplug.lock
*
- * Since cpu_hotplug_begin() is always called after invoking
+ * Since cpu_write_lock() is always called after invoking
* cpu_maps_update_begin(), we can be sure that only one writer is active.
*
* Note that theoretically, there is a possibility of a livelock:
@@ -106,25 +130,26 @@ void cpu_maps_update_done(void)
* get_online_cpus() not an api which is called all that often.
*
*/
-static void cpu_hotplug_begin(void)
+static void cpu_write_lock(struct cpu_lock *cpu_lock)
{
- cpu_hotplug.active_writer = current;
+ cpu_lock->active_writer = current;

for (;;) {
- mutex_lock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
- if (likely(!cpu_hotplug.refcount))
+ mutex_lock(&cpu_lock->lock);
+ if (likely(!cpu_lock->refcount))
break;
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_lock->lock);
schedule();
}
}

-static void cpu_hotplug_done(void)
+static void cpu_write_unlock(struct cpu_lock *cpu_lock)
{
- cpu_hotplug.active_writer = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&cpu_hotplug.lock);
+ cpu_lock->active_writer = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&cpu_lock->lock);
}
+
/* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
int __cpuinit register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
{
@@ -207,7 +232,8 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, i
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return -EINVAL;

- cpu_hotplug_begin();
+ cpu_write_lock(&cpu_hotplug);
+ cpu_write_lock(&online_map);
err = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE | mod,
hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
@@ -238,6 +264,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, i
err = PTR_ERR(p);
goto out_allowed;
}
+ err = -EAGAIN;
goto out_thread;
}

@@ -247,6 +274,7 @@ static int _cpu_down(unsigned int cpu, i

/* This actually kills the CPU. */
__cpu_die(cpu);
+ cpu_write_unlock(&online_map);

/* CPU is completely dead: tell everyone. Too late to complain. */
if (raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DEAD | mod,
@@ -260,7 +288,9 @@ out_thread:
out_allowed:
set_cpus_allowed(current, old_allowed);
out_release:
- cpu_hotplug_done();
+ if (err)
+ cpu_write_unlock(&online_map);
+ cpu_write_unlock(&cpu_hotplug);
return err;
}

@@ -289,7 +319,8 @@ static int __cpuinit _cpu_up(unsigned in
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
return -EINVAL;

- cpu_hotplug_begin();
+ cpu_write_lock(&cpu_hotplug);
+ cpu_write_lock(&online_map);
ret = __raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE | mod, hcpu,
-1, &nr_calls);
if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) {
@@ -313,7 +344,8 @@ out_notify:
if (ret != 0)
__raw_notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain,
CPU_UP_CANCELED | mod, hcpu, nr_calls, NULL);
- cpu_hotplug_done();
+ cpu_write_unlock(&online_map);
+ cpu_write_unlock(&cpu_hotplug);

return ret;
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/