Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke

[H. Peter Anvin]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> text_poke() itself only applies/unapplies the LOCK prefix - a single 
> byte. We shouldnt be doing that at all: the cost of LOCK is 
> insignificant (a few cycles) and most systems are SMP anyway.

Alas, on older CPUs the cost of LOCK can be massive.  The question is 
how much we really care - the embedded people (who would definitely be 
affected) will simply build UP kernels, and this only affects booting 
SMP kernels on UP.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/