Re: [PATCH] socket, socketpair w/flags, accept4

[Evgeniy Polyakov]

Hi.

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 02:20:47PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper (drepper@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> The code changes are really minimal.  And don't get too hung up on the
> internal name of the syscall.  I think accept4 is more desriptive than
> paccept since a) suffixes more easily indicate derived functionality
> and b) the 4 actually indicates to the initiated what has changed.
> If there are good reasons otherwise the userlevel interface can still
> be something completely different.

What about sigset there too?

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/