Re: microblaze syscall list

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 24 April 2008, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> here is current syscall table - I only rewrite your changes. I remove sys_ni_syscall except from #ifdefs. 
> I would like to match syscalls to logical block. Can I do it? (I'll fix unistd.h later)

yes, that makes a lot of sense to me. If we introduce a new
asm-generic/unistd.h, it's good to have it sorted in some
meaningful way, even if it is going to get messier over time.

> Can you look at it if I remove old syscalls? 
> I will continue tomorrow I am tired.

ok, I'll look at it tomorrow.

> 
> #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SIGNAL
> 	.long sys_signal
> #else
> 	.long sys_ni_syscall
> #endif
> #ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME
> 	.long sys_time
> 	.long sys_stime
> #else
> 	.long sys_ni_syscall
> 	.long sys_ni_syscall
> #endif

I guess I wasn't entirely clear with what I mean referring to
__ARCH_WANT_SYS_*. Instead of adding the #ifdef here, I meant
you should just remove the call entirely. With a few exceptions
that I already mentioned, the fact that there is an __ARCH_WANT
check in the syscall definition means that new architectures
should not reference the call, nor #define the __ARCH_WANT macro.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/