Re: [rfc] SLQB: YASA

[Nick Piggin]

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 05:17:39PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Hi 
> 
> > > Why is this not a patch set against SLUB?
> > 
> > It's a completely different design of the core allocator algorithms
> > really.
> > 
> > It probably looks quite similar because I started with slub.c, but
> > really is just the peripheral supporting code and structure. I'm never
> > intending to try to go through the pain of incrementally changing SLUB
> > into SLQB. If SLQB is found to be a good idea, then it could maybe get
> > merged.
> 
> Do you have performance mesurement result?
> I hope see it if possible.
> 
> Thanks! :)

Nothing really interesting, unfortunately. I have run some tests on
various microbenchmarks like tbench and things like that. But I
don't have many good ideas for more meaningful tests where slab
allocation performance is critial. Any suggestions? :)

Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/