Re: [PATCH]: Fix SMP-reordering race in mark_buffer_dirty

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Apr 02 2008 - 17:36:19 EST




On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Core 2 is the outlier in having a noticeably faster "mfence" than atomic
> instructions

Side note: mfence is probably faster than 6 cycles on Core 2. I've seen it
be basically zero-cost. Try adding a few memory ops around it - the timing
will probably change. Core 2 has this odd behaviour that it sometimes does
worse on the *really* trivial things that don't happen in real life.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/