Re: [PATCH] x86: simplify sync_test_bit()

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There really is no need for a redundant implementation here, just keep 
> the alternative name for allowing consumers to use consistent naming.

> -	__asm__ __volatile__("btl %2,%1\n\tsbbl %0,%0"
> -			     :"=r" (oldbit)
> -			     :"m" (ADDR),"Ir" (nr));

> +#define sync_test_bit test_bit

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/