Re: GIT commit description flag(s)

[Stefan Richter]

Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> I quite agree with you that the description is already there, but such 
> flags could help easily review or grep commits in order to identify your 
> areas of interest.
> 
> Even your example has ambiguity: "Wire up new timerfd syscalls" - It's 
> not easy to understand whether this particular commit is a bugfix, or it 
> speeds up things, or the old code which has been cleaned up, etc.

The fundamental problems
  - people sometimes chose bad summaries,
  - we can't always predict the full impact of the patch,
  - what's important for me isn't for you
cannot be solved by your proposed flags.

They can only be solved by
  - reviewing patches WRT good changelogs,
  - writing up extra summary release notes for areas of interest
    after the fact.

>>> It would be nice if [kernel] git commits had a flag [a char] (or a
>>> combination of) describing their main purpose which could be the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> bug Fix [F]
>>> Speed up/Performance [S]
>>> Revert [R]
>>> New functionality [N]

New bug [B]
Attempted bug fix which doesn't really work, a.k.a. nice Try [T]
Performance regression, a.k.a Downgrade [D]
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --== =-=--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/