Re: + pm-convert-wakeup-flag-accessors-to-inline-functions-fix.patch added to -mm tree

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Mar 19 2008 - 19:21:58 EST


On Wednesday, 19 of March 2008, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:48:29AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I'll drop everything, let's start again.
> > >
> > > Only how? umm, please review Greg's driver tree, let us know which patches
> > > shoudl be dropped from that then send new ones, I guess.
> >
> > Yes, please do, I'm confused as well :)
>
> Okay. No doubt Rafael will correct me if I get something wrong.
>
> Greg's tree still contains the original, wrong version of
> pm-make-wakeup-flags-available-whenever-config_pm-is-set.patch. It
> should be reverted. In its place should be substituted this series of
> patches (URLs for 0/3 ... 3/3):
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808422302&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808522316&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808522322&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561808622328&w=2
>
> There is likely to be a conflict in applying the 2/3 patch, because its
> first hunk touches a region of code also affected by work Rafael has
> been doing. The important aspect of that hunk is that it moves the
> should_wakeup flag definition outside the region protected by "#ifdef
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP".

I've just resent the three patches, rebased on top of the current tree.

Please double check if everytning is right.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/