Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Wed Mar 19 2008 - 16:42:33 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH][RESEND][v3] Modify loop device to be able to managepartitions of the disk image"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c"
In reply to: Ian Campbell: "Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ian Campbell wrote:

I practically never boot HVM Linux guests of any sort so no.

It's a first for me. I just wanted a test-env for these x86 trees.

J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH][RESEND][v3] Modify loop device to be able to managepartitions of the disk image"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c"
In reply to: Ian Campbell: "Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates"
Next in thread: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]