[PATCH 13/79] [PATCH] move setup_secondary_clock a little bit down in the function

[Glauber de Oliveira Costa]

From: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>

This is done so we call setup_secondary_clock() in the same place x86_64
does. A separate patch for this is appearantly not needed. But clock
initialization is such a delicate thing, that it's safer to do this way

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c
index 6c16165..4e5416e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot_32.c
@@ -185,7 +185,6 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
 	 */
 	check_tsc_sync_target();
 
-	setup_secondary_clock();
 	if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) {
 		disable_8259A_irq(0);
 		enable_NMI_through_LVT0();
@@ -214,6 +213,8 @@ static void __cpuinit start_secondary(void *unused)
 	unlock_ipi_call_lock();
 	per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE;
 
+	setup_secondary_clock();
+
 	wmb();
 	cpu_idle();
 }
-- 
1.5.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/